Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Goode

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1959No. 6383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff below, instituted this proceeding for the recovery of certain drilling equipment, damages for its detention, and for injunctive relief. Issue was joined, and by counter-claim, appellees, Hair and Russell, sought damages as a result of being dispossessed of the equipment by appellant pendente lite. The trial court found generally for appellees and from an adverse judgment, appellant prosecutes an appeal to this court.

Previously appellant had leased the equipment to one J. C. Goode, the terms of the lease reading:

“This Lease Agreement, made and entered into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. E. J. Stern and Mabel Stern v. The Dunlap Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Gonzales v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nichols v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Folquet v. Woodburn Public SchoolsOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Bokum v. ElkinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API