Legal Opinion

Folquet v. Woodburn Public Schools

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, C. J.

This appeal is from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and dismissing the action. The action was brought by plaintiff as administrator of his father’s estate to recover for breach of contract. The contract was entered into by plaintiff’s father and the defendant school district, and, by its terms, was to continue for a period of five years. On May 21, 1932, and before the contract had been fully executed, the father died- and thereupon the district terminated the contract and refused to permit the plaintiff as administrator to perform for the remainder of the term. The learned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burck v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Corvallis & Alsea River R. v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Haugen v. SundsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Meyer v. LivesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Mail-Well Envelope Company v. SaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Perthou v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  4. Weathers v. M. C. Lininger & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Hubbard v. GoodeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API