Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Rivera

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1933No. 3734PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, Chief Justice.

This suit results from Gonzales et al. v. Reynolds et al., 34 N. M. 35, 275 P. 922, to which reference may be had as to important facts. The appellants in that cause obtained from this court a supersedeas, staying the operation of the injunction granted by the district court. The effect of the supersedeas was to permit those appellants to continue in business in competition with the then appellees, pending the appeal. To obtain it they were required to give and did give a $5,000 bond conditioned to “pay all damages and costs suffered or sustained * * * by reason of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Chapman v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gonzales v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Di Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
  3. Stewart v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API