Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Anderson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939No. 4434PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

Plaintiff and appellee, F. W. Nichols, sued to restrain defendant and appellant, Melvin. Anderson, from engaging in soliciting or delivering laundry or dry cleaning in the town of Las Vegas, and for damages in the sum of $500 for having so engaged in such business contrary to a contract theretofore made with plaintiff and appellee; and, in addition, he sought to recover the sum of $80.83 for collections made upon laundry deliveries for which no accounting was made to plaintiff and appellee. Defendant and appellant denied generally the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Grand Union Tea Company v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Tolman Laundry, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Stewart v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Williams v. BoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Padilla v. LawrenceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API