Pringle v. Hunsicker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
This action was brought against Homer L. Hunsicker and defendant Amber Duck Products Corpora^ Mon for recovery of $3,456 owing by Hunsicker to Henry Pringle for wages earned between January 5, 1953, and November 6, 1953, long before the Amber Duck Products Corporation was formed; it resulted in judgment for said amount. Said corporation appeals from the judgment, which was rendered against it upon the theory, as expressed in the findings, that said corporation “was, in reality, but a continuation of the old company or business under a new name,”—the phrase “old company or business” referring…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hibernia Ins. v. St. Louis & New Orleans Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- McLellan v. Detroit File WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Atkinson v. Western Development SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pierce v. Riverside Mortgage Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Nichols v. NicholsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Economy Refining & Service Co. v. Royal National Bank of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Burwell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985