McLellan v. Detroit File Works
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
The plaintiffs, who are private bankers in the city of Detroit, bring suit on two promissory notes, signed “ Detroit File Works, S. Hayes, Pres’t,” one dated July 1, and one July 14, 1884. The defendant is a corporation, and the execution of the notes on its behalf is denied by affidavit.
On the trial of the case the following facts appeared: Prior to the incorporation of the defendant, Solomon Hayes and Zenas Rowe constituted a partnership in the city of Detroit, doing business under the firm name of “ Detroit File Works, Rowe & Hayes, Proprietors.” The partnership did its banking business…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West St. Louis Savings Bank v. Shawnee County BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- New York Iron Mine v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Perry v. Simpson Waterproof Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Carrier v. CameronMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by34 opinions
- Humboldt Min. Co. v. American Manufacturing, Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Chase v. Michigan Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Cook v. American Tubing & Webbing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1906
- Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sutton Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Germania Safety-Vault & Trust Co. v. BoyntonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.