Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Riverside Mortgage Securities Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1938No. Civ. 2151PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Arthur W. Pierce and Bessie R. Pierce brought this action against defendant for rescission of a contract of purchase of a deed of trust and promissory note from the Riverside Securities Company through the Riverside Mortgage Company. They were successful in their action and defendant has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for new trial. Such an order is not appealable (see. 963, Code Civ. Proc.) and the attempted appeal from it must be dismissed.
Arthur W. Pierce died after the entry of judgment. Bessie R. Pierce was appointed administratrix of his estate and has…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- American Railway Express Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1920
- Hibernia Ins. v. St. Louis & New Orleans Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Cyrenus Couture, Adm. Estate of Richard Couture v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. R. Hoe & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Rumford Printing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.