Legal Opinion
Kalina v. General Hospital of the City of Syracuse
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1961PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.
The defendants have moved under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaints ' for failure to state causes of action. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. Their identification as such is the only difference in their separate complaints.
The plaintiffs have cross-moved to supply a minor omission in their pleadings. This motion is granted and the complaints are considered to have been so amended for the purposes of the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
The plaintiffs are a faithful Jewish couple. A son was born to them in the defendant hospital. On his birth they gave notice to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Matthews v. Associated PressNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Fiorello v. New York Protestant Episcopal City Mission SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. Jamaica HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tinnerholm v. Parke Davis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Jamur Productions Corp. v. QuillNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Lisker v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Haight v. McEwenNew York Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.