Legal Opinion
Haight v. McEwen
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEugene P. Sullivan, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife. His cause of action is derivative.
The complaint alleges that the defendant, Marjorie McEwen, was operating an automobile owned by the other defendant, Robert McEwen, on a public highway in the Hamlet of Deans*583boro, Oneida County, and that, at the said time and place, Robert Dale Haight, Jr., son of these plaintiffs, was crossing the highway when the defendant, Marjorie McEwen, so carelessly and negligently operated the automobile that it struck the son of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Garrison v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Guilmette v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Champion v. GrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Park v. ChessinNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Campbell v. Westmoreland Farm, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.