Lisker v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMabio J. Cabiello, J.
Defendant Ohel Children’s Home (hereinafter “ the Home ”) moves to dismiss “ the causes of action alleged on behalf of plaintiff, Carmela Lisker * * * on the grounds that the complaint on her behalf fails to state a cause of action and is barred by the Statute of Limitations.”
The first cause of action is brought on behalf of Carmela Lisker who alleges that she is the mother and natural guardian *86of the infant plaintiff .Ralph Leonard Lisker and that on February 6,1971 she was requested by an employee of the New York City Bureau of Child Welfare to consent to the placement of the infant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pickle v. PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- MC GRADY v. RosenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Kalina v. General Hospital of the City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- McEntee v. New York Foundling HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. Jamaica HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Pittman v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Whitehorse v. CritchfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Cosner v. RidingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.