Legal Opinion
Jamur Productions Corp. v. Quill
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1966PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrancis T. Murphy, J.
The instant action, which has been joined with numerous other actions pending in this court and in the Civil Court of the City of New York, was instituted to recover for damages allegedly suffered as a result of the recent New York City transit strike. With respect to all the actions, the defendants (hereinafter referred to collectively as ‘the Unions ”) have moved for dismissal of each complaint for legal insufficiency.
The basic and critical objection to all of the complaints in issue here, is, simply, that regardless of the manner in which the causes are pleaded, no cognizable action in law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. Local 1291 of International Longshoremen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. J. M. Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Deena Products Co. v. United Brick & Clay Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Slavin v. . McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Boyle v. Anderson Fire Fighters Ass'n Local 1262Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Burke & Thomas, Inc. v. International Organization of MastersWashington Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.