Legal Opinion

Fiorello v. New York Protestant Episcopal City Mission Society

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

The learned justice presiding at Special Term denied defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint certain allegations which defendant claims to be irrelevant and redundant. A preliminary objection was made to the granting of the motion upon the ground that rule 105 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides that motions made under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, which provides for striking out matter in the complaint, “ must be noticed within twenty days from the service of the pleading to which the motion is addressed.” That rule also provides that “ The time to make such motion…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kalina v. General Hospital of the City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Zirn v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Glenbriar Co. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Hartmann v. American Mercury, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hull v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API