Legal Opinion
Parson v. Argue
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 1984No. CX-84-46PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Facts
This matter arises out of a dispute of a real estate sale in Chisago County. An order for summary judgment was granted to respondents July 15, 1983. Appellant Argue then sought amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order or a new trial. That motion was denied on December 2, 1983 and the order was served on appellant on December 9, 1983.
On January 6, 1984, this appeal was filed. The notice of appeal states that the appeal is taken pursuant to Rule 103.03(e), Minn.R.Civ.App.P. Respondents now seek dismissal of the appeal as from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dodge v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Weinzierl v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Frontier Lumber & Hardware, Inc. v. DickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Samels v. SamelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kassan v. KassanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Amatuzio v. AmatuzioCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Matter of JostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989