Legal Opinion

Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1989No. CO-89-589PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1984. In October 1988 a contempt hearing was held regarding allegations that appellant Natalie Johnson had violated the terms of the original judgment and decree and an April 15, 1985 order. By order on November 29, 1988, the trial court found Natalie in contempt on numerous grounds and ordered that she be psychologically evaluated. 1 No sanctions were imposed at the time; instead, the trial court continued the matter subject to Natalie’s psychological evaluation. The order of contempt specifically stated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Tell v. TellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Maher v. MaherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Parson v. ArgueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Marriage of Gorz v. GorzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Marriage of Huso v. HusoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie WingadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API