Legal Opinion

Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1988No. C2-88-2186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

The parties’ marriage was dissolved by judgment entered September 28, 1988. On October 11 respondent filed a motion for amended findings which was scheduled for hearing on October 27. On October 18 appellant filed this appeal seeking review of the September 28 judgment. Respondent also filed a notice of review, challenging portions of the same judgment. Respondent moves this court to remand the appeal so the trial court may rule on the pending motion.

DECISION

Generally, upon the filing of an appeal the trial court loses jurisdiction to amend or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Kempf v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waldner v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Marriage of Beeson v. BeesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Schmidt v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Matter of AhmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API