Legal Opinion
Matter of Jost
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1989No. C4-88-2349PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
Appellant James Lloyd Jost appeals from an order dated September 13, 1988, denying his motion for amended findings or, in the alternative, for a new trial, claiming that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding of dangerousness and that commitment to the Minnesota Security Hospital is not the least restrictive alternative. We dismiss the appeal as taken from a nonappealable order.
FACTS
By judgment entered December 4, 1987, Jost was found to be mentally ill and dangerous to the public and was committed to the Minnesota Security Hospital at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Anderson v. LangulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Knutson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Gabel v. FerodowillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of JostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993