Legal Opinion

Blacknall v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 2008No. A130410PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioner sought judicial review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision denying re-release on parole. We dismissed the petition as moot, designating the board as the prevailing party and awarding costs. Blacknall v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 200, 189 P3d 1234 (2008). The board then filed a statement of costs and disbursements, requesting $100 as a prevailing party fee, plus $39.90 in printing costs. Petitioner objects, arguing that ORS 144.335 (2005), amended by Or Laws 2007, ch 411, § l, 1 prohibits any award of fees or costs in this case. We allow the costs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Butler v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blacknall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. CAMPERS COVE RESORT, LLC v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Bentrott Family Properties LLC v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. CAMPERS COVE RESORT, LLC v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API