Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Palmer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 2002PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRACI, J.:

¶ 1 Lawrence R. Palmer (“Palmer”) appeals, pro se, the order entered December 14, 2001, disposing of his second petition brought pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Palmer’s petition was denied without a hearing, following proper notice, on the basis that he failed to make a strong prima facie showing that a miscarriage of justice occurred and because the petition was untimely filed. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On March 29, 1995, Palmer was convicted by a jury at case 199415697 of three counts…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. GarangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. BurkhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. GallmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API