Commonwealth v. Burkhardt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the Commonwealth’s failure to disclose a material witness’s subjective expectation of leniency in exchange for that witness’s testimony results in the denial of due process warranting a new trial. We conclude that the supposed understanding of the witness, if established, would be relevant to that witness’s credibility and therefore material. Nevertheless, on the facts presented here, we conclude, had the expectation of leniency been presented to the jury, that it would not have raised a reasonable probability that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Com. v. Bellon, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Bellon, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.