Legal Opinion

Chez, Atty. Gen. v. Industrial Comm. of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1936No. 5731PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

This is an application to prohibit the Industrial Commission from accepting from the town of Scipio the sum of $7,200 in consideration of the surrender and cancellation of seven of said town’s $1,000 bonds together with matured interest of $517.40. One bond, due June 1, 1984, and another due June 1, 1985, are in default. The other five bonds had not matured when this writ was sued out. The petition alleges that the present value of all the bonds is $7,200. The action is really to procure an interpretation of section 27, art. 6, of our State Constitution, which reads as follows:

“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stearns v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. American Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State Ex Rel. v. PadgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Industrial Commission v. StongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Hansen v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API