Legal Opinion

Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1951No. 35,360PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 45 N.W.2d 640.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying a petition for approval of a lump-sum settlement based upon a stipulation entered into by the employe-relator, the employer and its insurer, and the state treasurer as custodian of the special compensation fund (hereinafter called the special fund).

On or about December 1, 1944, relator sustained certain injuries in his employment. The employer and insurer have paid compensation to relator at the rate of $20 per week for 50 weeks of temporary total disability and for 130 weeks on the basis of a 65…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Miller v. SchlerethNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Chez, Atty. Gen. v. Industrial Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fehland v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mickey Edwards, Member of Congress, Oklahoma v. James Earl Carter, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API