Lankford v. Idaho
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
We granted certiorari to decide whether the sentencing process followed in this capital case satisfied the requirements of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.1 More narrowly, the question is whether, at the time of petitioner’s sentencing hearing, he and his counsel had adequate notice that the judge might sentence him to death.
The unique circumstance that gives rise to concern about the adequacy of the notice in this case is the fact that, pursuant to court order, the prosecutor had formally advised the trial judge and petitioner that the State would not recommend the death…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Hansen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.