Legal Opinion
N.A. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2001No. S-9578PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court terminated N.A.'s parental rights to her two daughters because of N.A.'s alcohol dependency, her mental impairment causing an inability to control her rage, and her continuing choice to live with a convicted sex offender. N.A. appeals, arguing that the superior court's failure to hold a permanency hearing violated due process and that the court erred in concluding that the state made active efforts to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the termination of her parental rights. We affirm.
II, FACTS…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- People in Interest of ARPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- A.H. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Maisy W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Lucy J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.