Legal Opinion

Klam v. Boehm

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1952No. 7821PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

Appellant seeks to recover damages from respondent and others for alleged unlawful arrest, false imprisonment and violence committed on his person by some of the police of Boise. Respondent R. G. Haskin was, at the time of the occurrence, chief of police. He filed a general demurrer to the complaint which was by the trial judge sustained. Appellant declined to plead further. Judgment in favor of the respondent, dismissing the action as to him, was entered. Plaintiff appealed.

The complaint alleges that two* police officers, Boehm and Kantack, wrongfully arrested, and with Rex…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Pavish v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Helgeson Ex Rel. Helgeson v. PowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Ruidoso-Hondo Valley HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. City of New Orleans v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. Lively v. City of BlackfootIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. WhelanIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. City of St. Louis ex rel. Forest v. NicholasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API