Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis ex rel. Forest v. Nicholas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1964No. 31492PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Judge.

This is an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have *548been sustained while the plaintiff was an inmate of the St. Louis city workhouse. The defendants moved to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, and their motion was sustained. Harry Forest, at whose relation the cause was brought, prosecutes this appeal.

The parts of the petition, as they relate to the question before us, are as follows:

“1. That defendant, Peter Nicholas, Jr., is and was at all times herein mentioned, Director of the Workhouse for the City of St. Louis,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Klam v. BoehmIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Somers v. OsterheldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Terrell v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. OwsleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Glenn v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Holt v. BowieDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1971
  4. Miller v. OwsleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API