Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ruidoso-Hondo Valley Hospital

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1963No. 7145PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This appeal is from the judgment of the trial court dismissing a suit against the defendants on the ground that the hospital was engaged in the performance of a governmental function and is immune from tort liability.

The appellant frankly concedes that our decision in Elliott v. Lea County, 1954, 58 N.M. 147, 267 P.2d 131, is directly contrary to the position now advanced. In that case, it was generally held that a county hospital is operated in a governmental, rather than a proprietary, capacity, and is, therefore, immune from liability in tort. Elliott is in accord with the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Boyer v. Iowa High School Athletic AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Sangre De Cristo Development Corp. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API