Legal Opinion

Parker v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1932No. 8296PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The Court of Appeals certified certain questions for decision by the Supreme Court.

Question 1: “Is a policeman of a municipality an employee of‘the municipal corporation, within the meaning of section 2(b) of the workmen’s compensation act (Acts 1920, p. 167) P See, in *526this connection, City of Macon v. Whittington, 171 Ga. 643; Marlow v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 28 Ga. App. 368.” By the -language of the statute, employees as therein defined must be such .under “contract of hire or apprenticeship.” (Ga. Laws 1920, p. 167, see. 2(b). A policeman is not such an- employee, but is a public officer…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Love v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Cornelisen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Gravitt v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Hall v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Mayor of Savannah v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Vogt Ex Rel. Vogt v. Borough of BelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. WindhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Aleksich v. Industrial Accident FundMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Langston v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API