Moore v. Bryson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
181 S.E.2d 113 (1971)
11 N.C. App. 260
Kathleen Bryson MOORE and husband, J. Meredith Moore
v.
T. D. BRYSON, Jr., et al.
No. 7130SC179.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
May 26, 1971.
Clark & Tanner by David M. Clark, Greensboro, for petitioner appellants.
J. Francis Paschal and E. C. Bryson, Jr., Durham, for defendants appellees.
GRAHAM, Judge.
Summary judgment is an extreme remedy and should be cautiously invoked to the end that parties will always be afforded a trial where there is a genuine dispute of facts between them. United Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 85 U.S. App.D.C. 9, 174 F.2d…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- McMichael v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Lee v. ShorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Moore v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.