Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bryson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 7130SC179Published

1Opinion of the Court

181 S.E.2d 113 (1971)

11 N.C. App. 260

Kathleen Bryson MOORE and husband, J. Meredith Moore

v.

T. D. BRYSON, Jr., et al.

No. 7130SC179.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 26, 1971.

Clark & Tanner by David M. Clark, Greensboro, for petitioner appellants.

J. Francis Paschal and E. C. Bryson, Jr., Durham, for defendants appellees.

GRAHAM, Judge.

Summary judgment is an extreme remedy and should be cautiously invoked to the end that parties will always be afforded a trial where there is a genuine dispute of facts between them. United Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 85 U.S. App.D.C. 9, 174 F.2d…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. McMichael v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Lee v. ShorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Moore v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API