Legal Opinion

McMichael v. Proctor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1956No. 667PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNHill, C. J.

The heirs challenge the final account filed by the petitioner in one respect only. They assert that the payment of the present cash value of the widow’s interest in the land sold to make assets should not be paid to her; that she wrongfully slew her husband, petitioner’s intestate; that she thereby forfeited her interest in her husband’s estate; and that the sum which represents the present cash value of her dower interest should be paid to those who would have inherited the same if she had predeceased plaintiff’s intestate.

Thus the appeals of the petitioner and the widow present one primary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Owens v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Parker v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Vernon v. R. J. Reynolds Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. In Re the Estate of GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Murrill v. . SandlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API