Legal Opinion

Lee v. Shor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1970No. 7010SC561PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Summary judgment is proper only when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56 North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. It is an extreme remedy and should be awarded only where the truth is quite clear. American Insurance Company v. Gentile Brothers Company, 109 F. 2d 732 (5th Cir. 1940). “Upon a motion for summary judgment it is no part of the court’s function to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Miller v. TaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Werner Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Moore v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API