Legal Opinion
Prioleau v. Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*944Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the challenged determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Rainer N Mittl, Ophthalmologist, P.C. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 100 NY2d 326, 331 [2003]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). Moreover, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Waldren v Town of Islip, 6 NY3d 735, 736 [2005]; Matter of Kreisler v New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775, 776 [2004]; Matter of Pell v…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Mittl v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kreisler v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- MATTER OF SINICROPI v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Waldren v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Alarcon v. Board of Education of South Orangetown Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Maselli v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Sturtevant v. HochmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Sturtevant v. HochmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014