Legal Opinion

Mittl v. New York State Division of Human Rights

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2003PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

In October 1988, petitioner, an ophthalmologist, hired complainant as a secretary in his Manhattan office. Complainant was married and had an infant daughter. Approximately a year later, complainant informed petitioner that she might be pregnant, and the pregnancy was confirmed in December 1989. In early February 1990, petitioner told complainant that his wife suspected that complainant was carrying his child, and he added that complainant’s pregnancy was “becoming a problem” in the office.

Later that month, complainant telephoned petitioner requesting two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. SmocumNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Belizaire v. Rav Investigative & Security Services Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Eugene Margerum v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. McGrath v. Toys "R" US, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Trathony Griffin Et Al., Appellants, v. Sirva, Inc., Et Al., RespondentsNew York Court of Appeals · 2017

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API