Legal Opinion
MATTER OF SINICROPI v. Bennett
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1983PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Respondent’s determination to terminate appellant’s employment, which was supported by substantial evidence in the record and did not constitute a disproportionate penalty, was proper. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 231-233.) Appellant is not entitled to termination pay because the collective bargaining agreement between respondent and her union provides that termination pay will not be awarded where termination of an employee is, as it was here, for cause. That agreement is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Antinore v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Antinore v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Amkraut v. HultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Amkraut v. HultsNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
3Cited by35 opinions
- MATTER OF GOMEZ v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ernst v. Saratoga CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Collins v. Parishville-Hopkinton Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Nabors v. Town of SomersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sigle v. SlavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.