Kreisler v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it “is so disproportionate to the offense . . . as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 237 [1974] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be concluded, as a matter of law, that the penalty of demotion shocks the judicial conscience. Petitioner’s remaining contentions lack merit.
Chief Judge…
2Cited by66 opinions
- Saunders v. Rock-land Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Montagnino v. FialaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Paul v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ward v. JuettnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kurot v. East Rock-Away Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.