Legal Opinion

Waldren v. Town of Islip

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2005PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, to the extent that it annulled so much of the Town’s determination as imposed a penalty and remitted for imposition of a less severe penalty, and the petition dismissed.

An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it “is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester *737County, 34 NY2d 222,…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. R.I., Inc. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Matter of Sekul v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Matter of Argenti v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Matter of Cupo v. Uniondale Fire Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Matter of Sassi v. City of BeaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API