Legal Opinion

Woodrow Haynes v. United States Pipe & Foundry Company (Anniston Soil Pipe Division, Formerly Known as T.C. King Pipe and Foundry Company)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1966No. 22727_1PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying an employee the right to sue his employer for wrongful discharge. Appellant, employed by the appellee, was discharged during the term of a collective bargaining agreement in effect between his union and the employer. The suit for wrongful discharge was filed in the Ala bama state court as a common law action and the employer removed it to the federal court on the jurisdictional basis of § 301(a) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.O.A. § 185. 1

The employer filed a defense in three counts. The second defense…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Edward T. Cannon v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. And Teamsters Local 710Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United Mine Workers of America, District No. 2, and United Mine Workers of America, Local No. 1269 v. Barnes & Tucker CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Elstner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
  5. James Lomax v. Armstrong Cork Company, Walter S. Radcliffe, Jr., and John N. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API