Legal Opinion
James Lomax v. Armstrong Cork Company, Walter S. Radcliffe, Jr., and John N. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1970No. 28462_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The appellant, plaintiff below, attacks a district court grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We conclude that the district court’s action passes muster, and affirm.
James Lomax brought an action pursuant to Section 301(a) of the National Labor Relations Act, Title 29, U.S.C. Section 185, against his former employer, Armstrong Cork Company (Armstrong) and Walter S. Radcliffe, Jr. and John N. Martin, plant manager and> assistant plant manager respectively, of Armstrong’s Jackson, Mississippi, operation for alleged wrongful discharge and violation of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Joseph J. Hayes v. New England Millwork Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Franklin W. Turner v. Air Transport Dispatchers' AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Paul G. Rabalais v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Julian Encina v. Tony Lama Boot Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Parks v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.