United Mine Workers of America, District No. 2, and United Mine Workers of America, Local No. 1269 v. Barnes & Tucker Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant United Mine Workers (“the Union”) initiated this action under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (1970), to obtain specific enforcement of certain grievance settlements negotiated by the Union with Barnes & Tucker Co. (“the employer”). The district court dismissed the action on the ground that the matters raised by the Union were exclusively within the grievance procedures established by the parties’ collective bargaining agreements and that the court therefore had no equitable power to deal with them.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Badon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America District No. 5 v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Bakers Union Factory, 326 v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- McCreedy v. Local Union No. 971 UAWCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- McNaughton v. Dillingham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.