Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Hoboken Manufacturers' Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 31, 1944No. 43PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
This is an appeal under 28 TJ. S. C. §§ 47a, 345, from a judgment by which the District Court for New Jersey, three judges sitting, set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, 47 F. Supp. 779.
The question is whether appellee, a terminal switching rail carrier, is entitled to an increase in the divisions which it now receives out of joint class and commodity freight rates maintained by it and numerous trunk line carriers, appellants here, on traffic interchanged by appellee at Ho-boken, New Jersey, with Seatrain Lines, Inc., a common carrier by water. The answer depends upon…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- United States v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.