Legal Opinion
Lang Transp. Corporation v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 5, 1948No. Civil Action 6403PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
The intervener, Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc., a California corporation, filed on January 30, 1941, an amended application with the Interstate Commerce Commission, requesting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. The petition requested the Commission to grant the intervener the right to - operate as a common carrier by motor vehicle over irregular routes in the transportation of petroleum and petroleum products in bulk, with certain exceptions. The route requested was from points in Ventura, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California, to points in…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Nashua Motor Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1964
- Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- United States v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Trans-American Van Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.