Legal Opinion

New England Divisions Case

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1923No. 646PublishedCited by 285 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Transportation Act, 1920, c. 91, § 418, 41 Stat. 456, 486, amending Interstate Commerce Act, § 15(6), authorizes the Commission, upon complaint or upon its own initiative, to prescribe, after full hearing, the divisions of joint rates among carriers parties to the rate. In determining the divisions, the Commission is directed to give due consideration, among other things, to the importance to the public of the transportation service rendered by the several carriers; to their revenues, taxes, and operating expenses; to the efficiency with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by285 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API