Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Goldfuss

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2002No. S-9658PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Kimberly (Kim) Faulkner raises numerous issues concerning child support, child custody, and property division in her divorce from Steven Goldfuss. We affirm as to most of these issues, including child custody. But because it was error to disallow Kim a deduction for the depreciation of several rental properties, to include as gross income child support Kim received for a child from a previous relationship, and to subtract the amount of that child support from her proposed deduction under Alaska Civil Rule 90.8(a)(1)(C), we vacate the child support award…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Turner v. PannickAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Zimin v. ZiminAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Harrower v. HarrowerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Tillmon v. TillmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hartley v. HartleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Iverson v. GriffithAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API