Legal Opinion

C.G.A. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1992No. Nos. S-3476, S-3477PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

I. PACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

C.G.A. is a minor who has received social security survivor’s benefits from the time of his father’s death. Social security regulations require that a representative payee (“payee”) be appointed for most minors who receive survivor’s benefits. 20 C.P.R. § 404.2010(b) (1990).1 Here, the Social Security Agency (“SSA”) originally designated C.G.A.’s mother, Ida Jousma, as C.G.A.’s payee. While serving as C.G.A.’s payee, Jousma received $150 per month from SSA for the benefit of C.G.A.

In December of 1987, when he was fifteen, C.G.A. was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. G & a CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Alaska Greenhouses, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. Zia, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gean v. HattawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Grace Thru Faith v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  3. In Re Estate of MerrittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. LaMothe v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services Finance & Support v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API