Legal Opinion

City of Oroville v. Superior Court of Butte Cnty.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2019No. S243247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by Cuéllar, J.

**307 *806 *1097 A dental practice suffered damage when raw sewage began spewing from the toilets, sinks, and drains of its building. The resulting damage triggered the inverse condemnation claim - an action to recover damages for injuries to private property caused by a public improvement - at the heart of this case. The dentists contend the City of Oroville (the City) is legally responsible for the property damage, because it was caused by the *1098 sewer system's failure to function as intended. According to the dentists, the failure was manifest when the system…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. DOTMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Roger Myers, et al. v. City of Auburn, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. Shehyn v. Ventura County Public Works AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Siskiyou County v. PacifiCorpDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Wittman v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API