City of Oroville v. Superior Court of Butte Cnty.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by Cuéllar, J.
**307 *806 *1097 A dental practice suffered damage when raw sewage began spewing from the toilets, sinks, and drains of its building. The resulting damage triggered the inverse condemnation claim - an action to recover damages for injuries to private property caused by a public improvement - at the heart of this case. The dentists contend the City of Oroville (the City) is legally responsible for the property damage, because it was caused by the *1098 sewer system's failure to function as intended. According to the dentists, the failure was manifest when the system…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamlin v. DOTMontana Supreme Court · 2022
- Roger Myers, et al. v. City of Auburn, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Shehyn v. Ventura County Public Works AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Siskiyou County v. PacifiCorpDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Wittman v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2022