Legal Opinion

Roger Myers, et al. v. City of Auburn, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 24, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00369Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGER MYERS, et al., No. 2:26–cv–00369–DC–CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. (ECF Nos. 6, 22, 25) 14 CITY OF AUBURN, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court are Defendants City of Auburn, Diamond Ridge Estates 18 Homeowners Association, Eugene Burger Management Corporation, Eugene Burger 19 Management of Auburn, Linda Martin, Tony Merjano, and Ray Green’s motions to dismiss. (ECF 20 Nos. 6, 22, 25.) Plaintiffs are appearing without counsel. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court 21…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API