Legal Opinion

In re the Special, September 1983, Grand Jury

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 9, 1985No. Misc. 83-199PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DILLIN, District Judge.

The witness, Lee J. Klein (hereafter Movant) has moved for a reconsideration of this Court’s Order of March 1, 1985. Although several issues were considered by this Court in the March 1, 1985 Order, the Movant seeks reconsideration of only three issues. The Movant seeks to quash Subpoena 83-199-VMC-01-60, alleging that compliance therewith would violate the attorney-client relationship as protected under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and would violate the attorney-client privilege. The Movant also asserts that the subpoena is overbroad…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. United States v. MaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In Re Jacqueline Schofield, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. John Doe v. TroisiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re KleinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. In the Matter of Lee J. Klein, a Witness Before the Special September 1983 Grand Jury, Appeal of John H. Weston, David M. Brown, Robert E. Smith, Carl L. Rubin, Stephen M. Taylor, and Michael Y. Sandborn, Witnesses Before the Special September 1983 Grand Jury, Appeal of Harry Virgil Mohney, Lee J. Klein, and Burton H. Gorelick, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Hueck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hueck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API