Legal Opinion
In re Klein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 16, 1985No. Nos. 85-1894, 85-1996, 85-1997 and 85-2230PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
A grand jury in Indianapolis is investigating potential income tax, arson, and other offenses. The “targets” of this investigation include Harry Virgil Mohney, Burton H. Gorelick, Lee J. Klein, and Michael Y. Sandborn. The “subjects” of the investigation include Robert E. Smith. Klein, Sandborn, and Smith are attorneys. Each represents other targets, subjects, and witnesses.
In January and February 1985 the grand jury served subpoenas on seven attorneys —Klein, Sandborn, Smith, and four others who the Government regards simply as witnesses. Each subpoena called for…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Beverly J. Ramsey, Michael J. Marshall, Stuart A. McCreary and James Joseph O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Stephen Tornay, Galene Tornay v. United States of America A.R. Demeter, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re: Grand Jury v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings: Victor Krynicki, Carol Falk Lopacich v. Ralph Falk IICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.