Legal Opinion
Hueck v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 14, 1992No. 82A010-9106-CR-184Published
1Opinion of the Court
590 N.E.2d 581 (1992)
Gordon HUECK and John F. Davis, Attorney, Appellants-Defendants,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff.
No. 82A010-9106-CR-184.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.
April 14, 1992.
Rehearing Denied June 1, 1992.
Stuart T. Bench, Bench Law Office, Indianapolis, for Gordon Hueck.
Robert Canada, Evansville, for John F. Davis.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for the State.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
Gordon Hueck ("Hueck") and John F. Davis ("Davis") appeal from an order…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Gerald L. Shargel, Esq. John Doe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In the Matter of Andrew C. Pavlick. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena For: William Lathan Osterhoudt, Luxana Phaksuan. Luxana Phaksuan, Movant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.