Hueck v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
Gordon Hueck (“Hueck”) and John F. Davis (“Davis”) appeal from an order denying attorney Davis’s motion to quash a subpoena issued to him to testify against Hueck in a criminal case charging Hueck with Dealing in a Schedule II Controlled Substance,1 a Class B felony; and Conspir-*583aey to Deliver a Schedule II Controlled Substance,2 a Class B felony. We affirm.
ISSUE
Does the attorney-client privilege prevent Davis from disclosing the identity of a third party fee payer?
FACTS
Attorney Davis represented Phillip Johnson (“Johnson”) in Vanderburgh Circuit…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Gerald L. Shargel, Esq. John Doe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In the Matter of Andrew C. Pavlick. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena For: William Lathan Osterhoudt, Luxana Phaksuan. Luxana Phaksuan, Movant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corll v. Edward D. Jones & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- State ex rel. Koster v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Penn Central Corp. v. BuchananIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Owens v. Best Beers of Bloomington, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shanabarger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.