Legal Opinion
Douglas County State Bank v. Sutherland
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
This suit was brought to recover on a promissory note. The defendants other than Sutherland are endorsers thereon.
The complaint sets out the making, execution and delivery of the note by Sutherland, the endorsement thereof by the other defendants for accommodation of the maker, and the nonpayment of the note.
The answering defendants, for their amended answer, deny generally the allegations in the complaint; and further answering, allege that they conditionally endorsed a note similar to that set out in the complaint ; that the condition was not complied with; that no demand was over made for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- International Harvester Co. of America v. McAdamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Claflin v. United States Credit System Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Burr v. BecklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilson v. KrygerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- L. J. Hablas v. Armour and Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Ohio Ex Rel. Superintendent of Banks v. EubankMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Liberty National Bank and Trust Co. v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.